Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-73305

HIGH

Budibase: Privilege escalation via public role assignment API missing app-level authorization

Published July 24, 2026Updated August 12, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary Budibase `3.39.19` (commit `03fbabae4`) is affected by a privilege-escalation / missing-authorization flaw in the public role-assignment API. An **app-scoped builder** (a user who builds only specific apps — `user.builder.apps = [appA]`, not a global builder or admin) can grant **themselves builder access to ANY other app in the tenant**, or assign themselves/any user an arbitrary data-plane role (e.g. `ADMIN`) in any app, by calling `POST /api/public/v1/roles/assign`. The endpoint only authorizes the two *global* flags (`admin`, `builder`); the per-app `appBuilder` and `role:{appId,roleId}` grant vectors are passed to the backend **without any authorization check that the caller controls the target app**. Reproduced in a local authorized lab using the verbatim authorization-gate and SDK logic. This is an incomplete fix of the role-assignment hardening in commit `d63d1d9054` ("Inline public user global role validation"), which only ever validated the global flags. ### Details The issue is caused by authorization being implemented as a **flag-level allowlist** (`admin`/`builder`) instead of validating the *scope* the caller is granting. Relevant code paths: - `packages/server/src/api/controllers/public/globalRoleValidation.ts` — `validateGlobalRoleUpdate(ctx, roleUpdate)` only checks `roleUpdate.admin` (requires `isAdmin`) and `roleUpdate.builder` (requires `isGlobalBuilder`). The `GlobalRoleUpdate` interface declares only `{ builder?, admin? }`; `appBuilder` and `role` are not referenced. - `packages/server/src/api/controllers/public/roles.ts` — `assign()` does `const { userIds, ...assignmentProps } = ctx.request.body; validateGlobalRoleUpdate(ctx, assignmentProps); await sdk.publicApi.roles.assign(userIds, assignmentProps)`. The `appBuilder`/`role` props pass through unvalidated. - `packages/pro/src/sdk/publicApi/roles.ts` — `assign()`: for `opts.appBuilder` it sets `user.builder = { apps: existing.concat([getProdWorkspaceID(opts.appBuilder.appId)]) }`; for `opts.role` it sets `user.roles[getProdWorkspaceID(opts.role.appId)] = opts.role.roleId`. No check that the caller builds the target app, and `userIds` is an arbitrary list (`bulkGet`). The only gate is the `isExpandedPublicApiEnabled()` license check. - `packages/server/src/api/routes/public/index.ts` — `applyAdminRoutes(roleEndpoints)` attaches **only** `middleware.builderOrAdmin` (no `publicApi`, no `authorized(PermissionType.USER, …)`). - `packages/backend-core/src/middleware/builderOrAdmin.ts` — with a `workspaceId` present, it only requires `isBuilder(ctx.user, workspaceId)`. The attacker sets `x-budibase-app-id` to **their own** app (appA), so the gate passes. - `packages/backend-core/src/middleware/builderOnly.ts` — on the worker, `POST /api/global/self/api_key` only requires `hasBuilderPermissions(ctx.user)`, which is true for app-scoped builders, so the attacker can self-issue a public API key. - `packages/shared-core/src/sdk/documents/users.ts` — `isGlobalBuilder` is false for app-scoped builders (so the global `builder` flag is correctly blocked), while `isBuilder(user, appA)` and `hasBuilderPermissions(user)` are true. Attack flow: 1. Attacker is an app-scoped builder of `appA` only (no global builder/admin). 2. `POST /api/global/self/api_key` (worker) — passes `builderOnly` via `hasBuilderPermissions` → attacker obtains a public API key. 3. `POST /api/public/v1/roles/assign` with header `x-budibase-app-id: <appA prod id>` and body `{"userIds":["<self>"],"appBuilder":{"appId":"<appB>"}}` — `builderOrAdmin` passes (`isBuilder(user, appA)`), `validateGlobalRoleUpdate` ignores `appBuilder`, the SDK pushes `appB` into `user.builder.apps`. 4. Attacker is now a builder of `appB` (and, via the `role` vector, can set any data-role such as `ADMIN` in any app). Security boundary crossed: - **Before:** builder of `appA` only. - **After:** builder of `appB` (and any other app) → read/modify all rows, read datasource configs and exfiltrate stored datasource credentials, edit automations (including the `bash`/`executeScript`/`executeQuery` steps); plus arbitrary data-role assignment in any app. - **Why disallowed:** the per-app builder model is meant to isolate builders to their assigned apps; a builder of one app must not gain authority over apps they were never granted. ### PoC Environment: - Budibase version: `3.39.19`, commit `03fbabae4` - Deployment: Business/Enterprise license required (`isExpandedPublicApiEnabled`) - Attacker role: app-scoped builder (`user.builder.apps=[appA]`), not global builder/admin - Mock services: none needed for the unit-level proof; HTTP PoC script provided for a licensed lab Steps (unit-level proof, no license needed — verbatim auth-gate + SDK logic): 1. Run the verification harness: ```bash cd D:/CVE-Hunting/budibase-audit-output/lab node harness/verify-privesc-authz.cjs ``` 2. Observed result (evidence: `evidence/lab-privesc-authz.log`): ```text [PASS-VALIDATION] appBuilder:{appId:APP_B} -> NOT rejected [PASS-VALIDATION] role:{appId:APP_B, roleId:'ADMIN'}-> NOT rejected [BLOCKED 403] builder:true (global) -> Only global builders or admins ... [BLOCKED 403] admin:true (global) -> Only global admins ... after : builder={"apps":["app_A...","app_B..."]} roles={"app_B...":"ADMIN"} isBuilder(attacker, APP_B) now = true <-- escalated to builder of APP_B ``` Steps (HTTP PoC for a licensed lab — `poc/privesc-roles-assign.sh`): ```bash # 1) self-issue API key curl -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/global/self/api_key -H "Cookie: <attacker session>" -d '{}' # 2) escalate: grant self builder of appB curl -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/public/v1/roles/assign \ -H "x-budibase-api-key: <KEY>" -H "x-budibase-app-id: <appA prod id>" \ -H "content-type: application/json" \ -d '{"userIds":["<self global id>"],"appBuilder":{"appId":"<appB>"}}' ``` 3. Expected result: ```text The request should be rejected (403) — an app-scoped builder must not be able to grant itself builder/role access to an app it does not control. Instead it returns 200 and the grant is applied. ``` Evidence files: - `evidence/lab-privesc-authz.log` - `poc/verify-privesc-authz.cjs`, `poc/privesc-roles-assign.sh` **Runtime limitation:** full HTTP end-to-end requires a Business/Enterprise license (`isExpandedPublicApiEnabled`); no license was cracked. The authorization defect is proven at unit level with the verbatim validation + SDK logic, and the route→validation→SDK call chain was independently verified by source review. ### Source PoC [Budibase-GHSA-Reports.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29161435/Budibase-GHSA-Reports.zip) ### Impact An attacker holding an **app-scoped builder** role on a single app in a licensed (Business/Enterprise) tenant can: * escalate to builder of **every other app** in the tenant (cross-app/workspace isolation bypass); * read and modify all rows in those apps; * read those apps' datasource configurations and **exfiltrate stored datasource credentials**; * edit automations in those apps, including server-side execution steps; * assign arbitrary data-plane roles (e.g. `ADMIN`) in any app to any user, including themselves. It does **not** grant the global `admin`/`builder` flags (those are validated), so it is not a direct global-admin takeover; but cross-app builder is effectively a tenant-wide app/data-plane compromise. No real secrets were accessed during testing; the lab used canary-only data.

Affected Packages (1)

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
@budibase/server
npm
All versionsRange-based data available

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

  • CWE-269
    Improper Privilege ManagementMITRE
  • CWE-862
    Missing AuthorizationMITRE
  • CWE-863
    Incorrect AuthorizationMITRE

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 8.8 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-73305?
Budibase: Privilege escalation via public role assignment API missing app-level authorization This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of HIGH (CVSS score: 8.8/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-73305?
CVE-2026-73305 affects @budibase/server. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-73305 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
8.8

High exploitability or significant impact. Prioritize remediation within days.

Also Known As

GHSA-j9fc-w3mr-x6mv

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-48150
    CRITICAL

    Budibase: Workspace-scoped builder escalates to global admin via /api/public/v1/roles/assign

  • CVE-2026-54350
    CRITICAL

    Budibase has nonymous NoSQL operator injection via published-app query templates

  • CVE-2026-35216
    CRITICAL

    Budibase: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Webhook Trigger and Bash Automation Step

  • CVE-2026-73302
    CRITICAL

    Budibase: OIDC SSO account takeover: incoming identity linked by email without checking email_verified

  • CVE-2026-35214
    HIGH

    Budibase: Path traversal in plugin file upload enables arbitrary directory deletion and file write

  • CVE-2026-50137
    HIGH

    Budibase: POST /api/attachments/:datasourceId/url is unauthenticated and lets anonymous callers mint S3 PUT pre-signed URLs using stored datasource IAM credentials

  • CVE-2026-45717
    HIGH

    Budibase: `PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceId` is protected only by `TABLE/READ` permission instead of builder access, allowing any authenticated app user to overwrite datasource connection parameters including host, port, and URL

  • CVE-2026-25044
    HIGH

    Budibase: Command Injection in Bash Automation Step

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies