GHSA-83g3-92jg-28cx

### Summary `tar.extract()` in Node `tar` allows an attacker-controlled archive to create a hardlink inside the extraction directory that points to a file outside the extraction root, using default options. This enables **arbitrary file read and write** as the extracting user (no root, no chmod, no `preservePaths`). Severity is high because the primitive bypasses path protections and turns archive extraction into a direct filesystem access primitive. ### Details The bypass chain uses two symlinks plus one hardlink: 1. `a/b/c/up -> ../..` 2. `a/b/escape -> c/up/../..` 3. `exfil` (hardlink) -> `a/b/escape/<target-relative-to-parent-of-extract>` Why this works: - Linkpath checks are string-based and do not resolve symlinks on disk for hardlink target safety. - See `STRIPABSOLUTEPATH` logic in: - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:255` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:268` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:281` - Hardlink extraction resolves target as `path.resolve(cwd, entry.linkpath)` and then calls `fs.link(target, destination)`. - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:566` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:567` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:703` - Parent directory safety checks (`mkdir` + symlink detection) are applied to the destination path of the extracted entry, not to the resolved hardlink target path. - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:617` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:619` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/mkdir.js:27` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/mkdir.js:101` As a result, `exfil` is created inside extraction root but linked to an external file. The PoC confirms shared inode and successful read+write via `exfil`. ### PoC [hardlink.js](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25240082/hardlink.js) Environment used for validation: - Node: `v25.4.0` - tar: `7.5.7` - OS: macOS Darwin 25.2.0 - Extract options: defaults (`tar.extract({ file, cwd })`) Steps: 1. Prepare/locate a `tar` module. If `require('tar')` is not available locally, set `TAR_MODULE` to an absolute path to a tar package directory. 2. Run: ```bash TAR_MODULE="$(cd '../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar' && pwd)" node hardlink.js ``` 3. Expected vulnerable output (key lines): ```text same_inode=true read_ok=true write_ok=true result=VULNERABLE ``` Interpretation: - `same_inode=true`: extracted `exfil` and external secret are the same file object. - `read_ok=true`: reading `exfil` leaks external content. - `write_ok=true`: writing `exfil` modifies external file. ### Impact Vulnerability type: - Arbitrary file read/write via archive extraction path confusion and link resolution. Who is impacted: - Any application/service that extracts attacker-controlled tar archives with Node `tar` defaults. - Impact scope is the privileges of the extracting process user. Potential outcomes: - Read sensitive files reachable by the process user. - Overwrite writable files outside extraction root. - Escalate impact depending on deployment context (keys, configs, scripts, app data).