Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-79675 — Vulnerability in nltk — CVE Details

CRITICAL

NLTK: JVM argument injection bypass via per-call options in the NLTK Stanford wrappers (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-12841)

Published September 1, 2026Updated September 10, 2026Source: osv

Summary

## Vulnerability The fix for CVE-2026-12841 (CWE-88, JVM argument injection) added `_validate_java_options()` to block dangerous JVM flags such as `-agentlib`, `-agentpath`, `-javaagent`, `-Xrunjdwp`, and `@argfile` references. However, the validation is only applied when setting global options via `config_java()`. The `java()` function's per-call `options` parameter -- added by PR #3683 (CVE-2026-12615 fix) -- passes options directly to `subprocess.Popen` without calling `_validate_java_options()`. All four Stanford Java wrapper classes accept user-supplied `java_options` and route them through the unvalidated per-call path, bypassing the CVE-2026-12841 fix entirely. ## Root Cause In `nltk/internals.py`, the `java()` function (line 128) accepts an `options` keyword argument. When `options` is not None, it is converted to a list and prepended to the JVM command (lines 211-217) without any validation: ```python # nltk/internals.py, lines 211-217 (HEAD) if options is None: java_options = _java_options # validated by config_java() else: if isinstance(options, str): options = options.split() java_options = list(options) # NO validation cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd ``` Compare with `config_java()` (line 92) which does validate: ```python # nltk/internals.py, lines 122-123 _validate_java_options(options) _java_options[:] = options ``` The four affected wrapper classes store user-supplied `java_options` without validation and pass them through the unvalidated per-call path: 1. `GenericStanfordParser` (`nltk/parse/stanford.py`): constructor parameter at line 39, stored at line 78, passed at lines 247 and 256 2. `StanfordTagger` (`nltk/tag/stanford.py`): constructor parameter at line 51, stored at line 79, passed at line 118 3. `StanfordTokenizer` (`nltk/tokenize/stanford.py`): constructor parameter at line 43, stored at line 66, passed at line 109 4. `StanfordSegmenter` (`nltk/tokenize/stanford_segmenter.py`): constructor parameter at line 68, stored at line 117, passed at line 337 ## Proof of Concept ```python from nltk.internals import config_java, java, _validate_java_options # 1. The global config_java() path correctly blocks dangerous flags: try: config_java(options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"]) except ValueError as e: print(f"config_java blocked: {e}") # blocked as expected # 2. The per-call options path does NOT block them: # (Would execute if Java were installed) # java(["SomeClass"], classpath=".", options=["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"]) # This passes "-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so" directly to subprocess.Popen # 3. Stanford wrapper classes pass through without validation: # from nltk.parse.stanford import StanfordParser # parser = StanfordParser(java_options="-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so") # parser.parse(...) # dangerous flag reaches JVM # Verify the gap directly: dangerous_opts = ["-agentpath:/tmp/evil.so"] try: _validate_java_options(dangerous_opts) print("Would have been caught") except ValueError: print("Correctly rejected by _validate_java_options()") # But java() itself never calls _validate_java_options(): import inspect source = inspect.getsource(java) assert "_validate_java_options" not in source, "java() does not validate options" print("Confirmed: java() does not call _validate_java_options()") ``` ## Impact An attacker who controls the `java_options` parameter to any NLTK Stanford wrapper class can inject arbitrary JVM flags, including: - `-agentpath:/path/to/malicious.so` -- loads a native agent, achieving arbitrary code execution - `-javaagent:/path/to/malicious.jar` -- loads a Java agent for bytecode manipulation - `-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,address=*:5005` -- enables remote debugging, allowing remote code execution - `@/path/to/argfile` -- expands an argument file, which can smuggle any of the above This is exploitable in scenarios where NLTK is deployed as a service and `java_options` is derived from user input, configuration files, or environment variables. The PR #3647 commit message explicitly states the fix was intended to cover "StanfordSegmenter, and GenericStanfordParser" but the implementation only validates in `config_java()`. ## Suggested Fix Add `_validate_java_options()` to the `java()` function's per-call options handling: ```python # nltk/internals.py, in the java() function if options is None: java_options = _java_options else: if isinstance(options, str): options = options.split() java_options = list(options) _validate_java_options(java_options) # ADD THIS LINE cmd = [_java_bin] + java_options + cmd ``` This single-line addition closes the bypass for all four Stanford wrapper classes and any future callers of `java(options=...)`. ### AI tooling AI assistance was used for the code audit and for drafting this report. The finding were manually verified against the project's source at the location cited above before reporting it, and the severity and impact assessment are the reporters.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published September 1, 2026 (41 days ago).
  • Last revised September 10, 2026 — 8 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

pip
Update nltk to 3.10.3 or later
pip install "nltk>=3.10.3"

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: pypi (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
nltk
pypi
0.8, 0.9, 0.9.3, 0.9.4 (+64 more)3.10.3

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.8 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-79675?
NLTK: JVM argument injection bypass via per-call options in the NLTK Stanford wrappers (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-12841) This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.8/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-79675?
CVE-2026-79675 affects nltk. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-79675 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.8

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-m4rf-3fr8-xwx3
PYSEC-2026-3749

Related CVEs

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies