Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-48788 — Vulnerability in github.com/umputun/remark42 —...

HIGH

Remark42: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on /api/v1/img via content-type spoofing

Published June 26, 2026Updated July 7, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary The remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from remark42's own origin. The download path decides whether the fetched resource is an image by looking only at the `Content-Type` header the remote server claims — it never inspects the actual bytes. The serving path then derives the response `Content-Type` by sniffing those bytes with `http.DetectContentType`. An attacker hosts a URL that sets `Content-Type` to `image/png` but returns an HTML/JavaScript body: * the download check sees `image/png` → accepts it; * the serve path sniffs the body → emits `Content-Type: text/html`; * the browser renders attacker HTML/JS as a document in remark42's origin. ### Details #### Downloader `backend/app/rest/proxy/image.go` — `downloadImage()`, lines 189-206: ```go contentType := resp.Header.Get("Content-Type") if !strings.HasPrefix(contentType, "image/") { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid content type %s", contentType) } maxSize := 5 * 1024 * 1024 // 5MB default if p.ImageService != nil && p.ImageService.MaxSize > 0 { maxSize = p.ImageService.MaxSize } lr := io.LimitReader(resp.Body, int64(maxSize)+1) imgData, err := io.ReadAll(lr) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to read image body: %w", err) } if len(imgData) > maxSize { return nil, fmt.Errorf("image is too large") } return imgData, nil // <-- bytes never validated, returned as-is ``` Send `Content-Type: image/png` and the check passes regardless of what the body actually contains. #### Server `backend/app/rest/proxy/image.go` — `Handler()`, line 131: ```go w.Header().Add("Content-Type", p.ImageService.ImgContentType(img)) _, err = io.Copy(w, bytes.NewReader(img)) ``` `backend/app/store/image/image.go` — `ImgContentType()`, lines 242-249: ```go func (s *Service) ImgContentType(img []byte) string { contentType := http.DetectContentType(img) if contentType == "application/octet-stream" { return "image/*" } return contentType // <-- returns text/html for an HTML body } ``` ### PoC ```python self.send_response(200) self.send_header("Content-Type", "image/png") self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(body))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(body) # body = <!DOCTYPE html><script>...</script> ``` Then have the victim open `https://<remark42-host>/api/v1/img?src=<base64(attacker-host)>` top-level. ### Impact * The script can issue authenticated, same-origin API calls with `credentials: 'include'` — the JWT cookie is sent automatically. * The script can read the `XSRF-TOKEN` cookie and re-send it as the `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header, defeating CSRF protection. The attacker acts as the victim: delete/edit their comments, change their settings, and — if the victim is admin — perform admin actions. Triggering requires no remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means (email, DM, link on another site, etc.). ### Fix `v1.16.0` adds layered defense to `/api/v1/img` and `/api/v1/picture/{user}/{id}`: * `rest.SafeImgContentType` validates sniffed body bytes against a strict allowlist (`image/png`, `image/jpeg`, `image/gif`, `image/webp`, `image/bmp`, `image/x-icon`). Non-image content returns `415` with no body echo. SVG is implicitly excluded. * Every response carries `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'none'; sandbox; frame-ancestors 'none'`, `X-Content-Type Options: nosniff`, and `Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image"`. * The ETag is bumped to `"v2:<base64(src)>"`. Browsers that revalidate cached pre-fix responses get a fresh validated `200` instead of a `304` against the poisoned cached entry. * The strict `default-src 'none'; sandbox` CSP also applies to all `/api/v1/*` routes as defense-in-depth. #### Residual exposure Browser-local caches that already hold a pre-fix `text/html` response with `Cache-Control: max-age=2592000` keep serving it from local store until the TTL expires or the cache is evicted under memory pressure. The ETag bump only reaches clients that revalidate during the cached lifetime. Operators running a CDN/edge cache in front of remark42 should purge `/api/v1/img` after deploying `v1.16.0`.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published June 26, 2026 (108 days ago).
  • Last revised July 7, 2026 — 11 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

Go
Update github.com/umputun/remark42 to 1.16.0 or later
go get github.com/umputun/remark42@v1.16.0

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: go (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
github.com/umputun/remark42
go
All versions1.16.0

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 8.2 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-48788?
Remark42: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on /api/v1/img via content-type spoofing This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of HIGH (CVSS score: 8.2/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-48788?
CVE-2026-48788 affects github.com/umputun/remark42. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-48788 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
8.2

High exploitability or significant impact. Prioritize remediation within days.

Also Known As

GHSA-4c8j-mgm4-qqvp
GO-2026-5804

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-107809
    HIGH

    Nginx-UI AuthRequired token cookie fallback enables CSRF against management APIs

  • CVE-2026-107813
    HIGH

    Nginx UI: Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-84315 - the api/cluster router was not - wrapped in RequireSecureSession, so those sensitive mutations run without OTP step-up

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies