CVE-2026-45363 — Vulnerability in jwt — CVE Details

`JWT.decode(token, '', true, algorithm: 'HS256')` accepts an attacker-forged token. `OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', '', payload)` returns a valid digest under an empty key, and no `raise InvalidKeyError if key.empty?` precondition exists in the HMAC algorithm. ``` JWT.decode(token, "", true, algorithm: 'HS256') -> JWA::Hmac.verify(verification_key: "", ...) -> OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', "", signing_input) == signature ``` The same path is reached when a keyfinder block or key_finder: argument returns "", nil, or an array containing nil for an unknown key. JWT::Decode#find_key only rejects literal nil and empty arrays, and JWT::JWA::Hmac silently coerces nil to "" (signing_key ||= '') before signing. ``` JWT.decode(token, nil, true, algorithms: ['HS256']) { |_h| "" } -> find_key returns "" # "" && !Array("").empty? == true -> JWA::Hmac.verify(verification_key: "", ...) -> verifies ``` Common application patterns that produce the unsafe value: `redis.get("kid:#{kid}").to_s`, ORM string columns with `default: ''`, `ENV['SECRET'] || '', Hash.new('')` lookups, [primary, fallback] where fallback may be nil. Applications passing a non-empty static key:, or whose keyfinder returns nil / raises on miss, are not affected. The existing `enforce_hmac_key_length` option would block this but defaults to false. On OpenSSL ≥ 3.5 the empty-key HMAC.digest call no longer raises, so the OpenSSL-3.0 rescue in JWA::Hmac#sign does not fire. Affects HS256/HS384/HS512 via both JWT.decode (positional key and block keyfinder) and `JWT::EncodedToken#verify_signature!(key_finder:)`