Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-40880

HIGH

Zebra: Cached Mempool Verification Bypasses Consensus Rules for Ahead-of-Tip Blocks

Published April 18, 2026Updated May 5, 2026Source: osv

Summary

# CVE-2026-40880: Cached Mempool Verification Bypasses Consensus Rules for Ahead-of-Tip Blocks ## Summary A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By carefully submitting a transaction that is valid for height `H+1` but invalid for `H+2` and then mining that transaction in a block at height `H+2`, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. ## Severity High - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes. ## Affected Versions All Zebra versions prior to version 4.3.1. (Some older versions are not affected but are no longer supported by the network) ## Description The vulnerability exists due to a performance optimization whose goal is to improve performance of transaction validation if the transaction was previously accepted into the mempool (and thus was verified as valid). That however did not take into account that a transaction can be valid for a specific height, but invalid at higher heights; for example, it can contain an expiry height, a lock time, and it is always bound to a network upgrade, all of which are height-dependant. An attacker (specifically a malicious miner) could exploit this by (e.g. in the expiry height case): - Submitting a transaction with expiry height `H+1` (where `H` is the height of the current tip) - Mining a block `H+1`, and a block `H+2` that contains that same transaction, and submitting block `H+2` before `H+1` - Zebra nodes would accept `H+2` as valid (pending contextual verification) and wait for block `H+1`; when it arrives, Zebra would commit both blocks even if `H+2` contains an expired transaction - Other nodes (like `zcashd` or `zebrad` nodes without that transaction in their mempool) reject the block, resulting in a chain fork where the poisoned Zebra node is isolated. ## Impact **Consensus Failure** **Attack Vector**: Network (specifically via a malicious miner). **Effect**: Network partition/consensus split. **Scope**: Any Zebra node utilizing the transaction verification cache optimization for V5 transactions. ## Fixed Versions This issue is fixed in **Zebra 4.3.1**. We removed the performance optimization altogether, since we deemed it too risky. The fix ensures that verification is only skipped if the transaction's full integrity—including authorization data—is validated against the mempool entry. ## Mitigation Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.3.0 or later immediately. There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to ensure the node remains on the correct consensus path and is protected against malicious chain forks. ## Credits Thanks to @sangsoo-osec for a thorough advisory submission that noticed the lock time issue, and to @shieldedonly with an also thorough advisory (that was submitted while we were working on the first one) who noticed that the issue applied to other aspects of the transaction validation.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

Cargo
Update zebra-consensus to 5.0.2 or later
cargo update -p zebra-consensus --precise 5.0.2
Cargo
Update zebrad to 4.3.1 or later
cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.3.1

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (2)

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
zebra-consensus
crates.io
All versions5.0.2
zebrad
crates.io
All versions4.3.1

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.2 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-40880?
Zebra: Cached Mempool Verification Bypasses Consensus Rules for Ahead-of-Tip Blocks This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of HIGH (CVSS score: 9.2/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-40880?
CVE-2026-40880 affects zebra-consensus and zebrad. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-40880 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.2

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-xvj8-ph7x-65gf

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-41584
    CRITICAL

    Zebra has rk Identity Point Panic in Transaction Verification

  • CVE-2026-41583
    CRITICAL

    Zebra Vulnerable to Consensus Divergence in Transparent Sighash Hash-Type Handling

  • CVE-2026-34377
    HIGH

    Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions

  • CVE-2026-52736
    HIGH

    Zebra has block suppression via NU5 same-header body poisoning of sent-hash cache

  • CVE-2026-52829
    HIGH

    Zebra Address Book Aborted by IPv4-Mapped Mempool Misbehavior Update

  • CVE-2026-41585
    MEDIUM

    Zebra Vulnerable to Denial of Service via Interrupted JSON-RPC Requests from Authenticated Clients

  • CVE-2026-52733
    MEDIUM

    zebrad has persistent on-disk corruption of Sapling/Orchard subtree roots after chain fork via pop_tip

  • CVE-2026-44500
    MEDIUM

    Zebra Vulnerable to Allocation Amplification in Inbound Network Deserializers

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies