Loading...
Skip to main content

CVE-2025-64767 — Vulnerability in @hpke/core — CVE Details

CRITICAL

@hpke/core reuses AEAD nonces

Published November 20, 2025Updated November 21, 2025Source: osv

Summary

### Summary The public SenderContext Seal() API has a race condition which allows for the same AEAD nonce to be re-used for multiple Seal() calls. This can lead to complete loss of Confidentiality and Integrity of the produced messages. ### Details The SenderContext Seal() [implementation](https://github.com/dajiaji/hpke-js/blob/b7fd3592c7c08660c98289d67c6bb7f891af75c4/packages/core/src/senderContext.ts#L22-L34) allows for concurrent executions to trigger `computeNonce()` with the same sequence number. This results in the same nonce being used in the suite's AEAD. ### PoC This code reproduces the issue (and also checks for more things that could be wrong with the implementation). ```js import { CipherSuite, KdfId, AeadId, KemId } from "hpke-js"; const suite = new CipherSuite({ kem: KemId.DhkemP256HkdfSha256, kdf: KdfId.HkdfSha256, aead: AeadId.Aes128Gcm, }); const keypair = await suite.kem.generateKeyPair(); const skR = keypair.privateKey; const pkR = keypair.publicKey; const sender = await suite.createSenderContext({ recipientPublicKey: pkR, }); const [message0, message1] = await Promise.all([ sender.seal( new TextEncoder().encode("Secret message 1: Attack at dawn").buffer ), sender.seal( new TextEncoder().encode("Secret message 2: Withdraw troops").buffer ), ]); const recipient = await suite.createRecipientContext({ recipientKey: skR, enc: sender.enc, }); const plaintext0 = await recipient.open(message0); console.log("✓ Decrypted message seq=0", new TextDecoder().decode(plaintext0)); try { console.log( "✓ Decrypted message seq=1", new TextDecoder().decode(await recipient.open(message1)) ); console.log("\n✓ nonce-reuse reproduction completed, code is NOT vulnerable"); } catch (error) { // re-sequence the recipient to verify same nonce was used for two messages recipient._ctx.seq = 0; console.log( "❌ Decrypted a different message with seq=0", new TextDecoder().decode(await recipient.open(message1)) ); console.log( "\n✓ nonce-reuse reproduction completed, code is vulnerable, nonces are reused when concurrent calls to .seal() are used" ); } // Test that failed Open() doesn't increment sequence const recipient2 = await suite.createRecipientContext({ recipientKey: skR, enc: sender.enc, }); const invalidMessage = new Uint8Array(message0.byteLength); invalidMessage.set(new Uint8Array(message0)); invalidMessage[0] ^= 0xff; // Corrupt the first byte try { await recipient2.open(invalidMessage.buffer); } catch {} // Now try to open the first valid message - should still work with seq=0 try { await recipient2.open(message0); console.log("✓ Successfully decrypted message with seq=0 after failed open()"); console.log("✓ Failed open() did NOT increment sequence"); } catch (error) { console.log("❌ Failed to decrypt message - sequence was incorrectly incremented"); } // Test that same message produces same ciphertext due to nonce reuse const sender2 = await suite.createSenderContext({ recipientPublicKey: pkR, }); const sameMessage = new TextEncoder().encode("Identical message").buffer; const [cipher0, cipher1] = await Promise.all([ sender2.seal(sameMessage), sender2.seal(sameMessage), ]); const cipher0Array = new Uint8Array(cipher0); const cipher1Array = new Uint8Array(cipher1); let identical = true; if (cipher0Array.length !== cipher1Array.length) { identical = false; } else { for (let i = 0; i < cipher0Array.length; i++) { if (cipher0Array[i] !== cipher1Array[i]) { identical = false; break; } } } if (identical) { console.log("\n❌ Same message produced IDENTICAL ciphertext (nonce reuse confirmed)"); } else { console.log("\n✓ Same message produced different ciphertext (nonces are unique)"); } ``` ### Recommendation Implement a synchronization mechanism such that only one seal()/open() per context can be executed at a time. ### Notes Refs: https://github.com/hpkewg/hpke/issues/38 > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#section-9.7.5 > The AEADs specified in this document are not secure in case of nonce reuse. > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#section-5-6 > A context is an implementation-specific structure that encodes the AEAD algorithm and key in use, and manages the nonces used so that the same nonce is not used with multiple plaintexts. The context implementation in @hpke/core is not correct given its AEAD Seal() is awaited/asynchronous.

Advisory Timeline

  • First published November 20, 2025 (326 days ago).
  • Last revised November 21, 2025 — 1 day after initial publication.

Remediation

Upgrade to the fixed version using your package manager.

npm
Update @hpke/core to 1.7.5 or later
npm install @hpke/core@1.7.5

After upgrading, run your dependency scanner again to confirm the vulnerability is resolved.

Affected Packages (1)

Affects 1 ecosystem: npm (1).

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed In
@hpke/core
npm
All versions1.7.5

Vulnerability Classification

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) identifiers for this vulnerability type.

CVSS Score Breakdown

What the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 9.1 score means for each attack dimension.

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CVE-2025-64767?
@hpke/core reuses AEAD nonces This vulnerability has been assigned a severity rating of CRITICAL (CVSS score: 9.1/10).
How do I check if my project is affected by CVE-2025-64767?
CVE-2025-64767 affects @hpke/core. Use GeekWala's free vulnerability scanner to check your dependencies against CVE-2025-64767 and 200,000+ other known vulnerabilities.

Severity & Exploitability

CVSS Score
9.1

Exploitation is straightforward and causes maximum impact. Patch immediately.

Also Known As

GHSA-73g8-5h73-26h4

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-107722
    CRITICAL

    fast-jwt: Incomplete patch of CVE-2026-34950: Non-whitespace key-prefix re-enables RSA→HS256 algorithm confusion

  • CVE-2026-108261
    CRITICAL

    TinaCMS admin preview iframe loads an attacker-controlled origin from the URL fragment

Check if you're affected

Scan your dependencies to see if this vulnerability affects your projects.

Scan Your Dependencies